Most developers use AI in one of three broken ways. If any of these sound like you, don't worry — everyone starts here.
The three models that don't work
The Autocomplete Trap
You write most of the code yourself and let AI finish your sentences. It suggests variable names, completes function bodies, fills in imports. You're getting maybe 20-30% more throughput. Your IDE just got a bit smarter, that's all.
The Stack Overflow Trap
You paste problems into ChatGPT and copy-paste solutions back. Faster than searching, sure, but the answers are generic. They don't know about your database schema, your naming conventions, or the library versions you're actually using. You spend two hours integrating a solution that didn't account for your project's specifics.
The Unguided Generator Trap
You tell AI to build whole features without constraints. It picks its own architecture, invents patterns, and creates code that technically works but doesn't fit anything else in your codebase. Now you've got six different patterns for the same thing. Congratulations — you've automated technical debt.
The model that works
Give AI your decisions. Then get out of its way.
| Decision | Who decides | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Domain entities and relationships | You | Requires business understanding |
| API contracts and shapes | You | Defines system boundaries |
| Database schema | You | Impacts everything downstream |
| Security model | You | Mistakes leak data |
| Error handling strategy | You | Affects user experience |
| Variable naming, imports | AI | Low impact, easily fixed |
| Test boilerplate | AI | Follows your existing patterns |
| Documentation wording | AI | Mechanical translation |
| CRUD operations | AI | Pure pattern repetition |
The five-minute investment that saves five hours
Here's what the partnership looks like in practice. You write a Pydantic schema — 5-10 minutes of actual thinking about your domain:
class TaskCreate(BaseModel):
project_id: UUID
assignee_id: UUID
due_date: datetime
story_points: int = Field(default=3, ge=1, le=21)
priority: TaskPriority
description: str = Field(..., min_length=3, max_length=500) From that single schema, AI generates the service layer (30 seconds), route handlers (30 seconds), database migration (20 seconds), test suite (45 seconds), and TypeScript types (20 seconds). Five minutes of your thinking, five minutes of AI execution, and you've got a complete feature that follows every convention in your project.
The compression timeline
| Timeline | Compression | What's happening |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | 2x | Learning the partnership model |
| Month 1 | 4x | Patterns documented, AI follows them |
| Month 3 | 8x | Extensive pattern library built up |
| Month 6 | 10x | Every new feature fits established patterns |
Four failure modes to watch for
- Insufficient context — AI generates wrong patterns? Your docs need updating, not your prompts
- Blind trust — Never merge code you haven't reviewed. AI writes confident nonsense just as fluently as confident correctness
- Micromanaging — If you're dictating variable names to AI, you're doing it wrong. Focus on what and why
- No quality gates — Type checking, linting, and tests catch AI mistakes automatically. Without them, mistakes ship to production